CO129-308 - Public Offices - 1901 — Page 521

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

the content in of the Colonial Govt.,

that W.O. should pay the value & the capitalized Crown rent, would

seem to be justified.

(The W.O. are other S.O.C.'s to the value of the land will have to be met ultimately, if it is pressed, I an independent valuation

must first arrange Rabici's fee, to avoid the dispute that occurred in

but was provisionally transferred to the W.O.

516 the W.O. would still

before that date

actually

be bound to pay for the land and not

merely to credit the

amount

to the Colony

in the Mil: Lands Account as

pointed out in para 3 of letter on 31905

there

to the

an

in Caplen)

A.R.14/5

Draft for Carson pointing out that

the letter of 1897 referred to only related to the provision of sites for particular works

that as general

stated in our letter in 20764/00 the liability of the Colony to give land, free of cost, has never been admitted

and

that under the

the

par.99

case of Hong Kong

Zwh. quotes

dear to the too concurred in in their letter

the War Dept.

Now

that the Mil:

32932/00 Contribution has been fixed at 20%, is to pay for all land required for military purposes even if it be contended that

Letter

an 14289

98.

whereas Chidiya

new work

this new-arrangement only came into operation on the 1st Jan last & that this land

(x)-81215-4000-6-1900

36518-3000-11-1900

as obligation

the Colony to

hand over land to the War Dept in

anticipation of any Mil Land being surrendered to the Colony,

How

fact the practically

not

Mil: Lands Account has with the

come into existence in since the

value of the Lands hitherto surrendered to

the Colony only amounts to $42,

Saft

20

& take opportunity of again asking W.O. to pay to H. Kong $10,465.04 referred to

in letter

Ow

31905

Edit History

2026-06-01 05:11:24 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
the content in of the Colonial Govt., that W.O. should pay the value & the capitalized Crown rent, would seem to be justified. (The W.O. are other S.O.C.'s to the value of the land will have to be met ultimately, if it is pressed, I an independent valuation must first arrange Rabici's fee, to avoid the dispute that occurred in but was provisionally transferred to the W.O. 516 the W.O. would still before that date actually be bound to pay for the land and not merely to credit the amount to the Colony in the Mil: Lands Account as pointed out in para 3 of letter on 31905 there to the an in Caplen) A.R.14/5 Draft for Carson pointing out that the letter of 1897 referred to only related to the provision of sites for particular works that as general stated in our letter in 20764/00 the liability of the Colony to give land, free of cost, has never been admitted and that under the the par.99 case of Hong Kong Zwh. quotes dear to the too concurred in in their letter the War Dept. Now that the Mil: 32932/00 Contribution has been fixed at 20%, is to pay for all land required for military purposes even if it be contended that Letter an 14289 98. whereas Chidiya new work this new-arrangement only came into operation on the 1st Jan last & that this land (x)-81215-4000-6-1900 36518-3000-11-1900 as obligation the Colony to hand over land to the War Dept in anticipation of any Mil Land being surrendered to the Colony, How fact the practically not Mil: Lands Account has with the come into existence in since the value of the Lands hitherto surrendered to the Colony only amounts to $42, Saft 20 & take opportunity of again asking W.O. to pay to H. Kong $10,465.04 referred to in letter Ow 31905
Baseline (Original)
the contente in of the Colonial Gat?, that W.U. should fay the valen + the capitalized Grove rent, would tobe justified. seem new as (The W.0.- arether 5.0.C.'s to the value of the land will have lobe met siltemality, if it is pressed, I an independent valuation must first arrange rabici's fee, bavoid the dispute that occured in but wi valucis mas provisionally transferred to the to. 516 the wo would still before that date actually be bound to pay for the land and not merely to credit the amount o the Colony in the bol: Mil: Lanos Account Ance, as pointed out in para 3 of letter on 31905 there to the an in Caplen) A. R. 14/5 Draft for carson pointing out that the letter of 1897 referred to anly related to the provision of sites for particular works that as geniral stated in our letter in 20764/00 the liability of the Colony to give land, free of ast, has never been admitted en the and that under the the par.99 case of Thug Kong Zwh. quotes deap to the too carcurred in in their letter the War Dept. Now that the Mil: 32932/00 Contribution has been fined at 20%, is to bay for all land required for military purposes seven if it be contended that Lette an 14289 98. wherea Chidiya newtor work this new-arrangement only came into operation on the bet. Jan last & that this land (x)-81215-4000-6-1900 36518-3000-11-1900 as obligation 001 the Colony to hand wer land to the War Dept in anticipation of any Mel Land being morendered to the Colony, How fact the practically not Me: Lands Account has with th come into existence in Sthing unce the value of thul Lands hitter to merendered t the Colony only amounts to $42, Saft 20 Sx X & take offortunity of again asking W.I to pay to H. Kong $ 10, 465.04 referred to in letter Ow 31905
2026-06-01 05:11:24 · Baseline
View content

the contente in of the Colonial Gat?,

that W.U. should fay the valen + the capitalized Grove rent, would

tobe justified.

seem

new as

(The W.0.- arether 5.0.C.'s to the value of the land will have lobe met siltemality, if it is pressed, I an independent valuation

must first arrange rabici's fee, bavoid the dispute that occured in

but wi valucis

mas provisionally transferred to the to.

516 the wo would still

before that date

actually

be bound to pay for the land and not

merely to credit the

amount

o the Colony

in the bol: Mil: Lanos Account Ance, as

pointed out in para 3 of letter on 31905

there

to the

an

in Caplen)

A. R. 14/5

Draft for carson pointing out that

the letter of 1897 referred to anly related to the provision of sites for particular works

that as geniral

stated in our letter in 20764/00 the liability of the Colony to give land, free of ast, has never been admitted

en the

and

that under the the

par.99

case of Thug Kong

Zwh. quotes

deap to the too carcurred in in their letter

the War Dept.

Now

that the Mil:

32932/00 Contribution has been fined at 20%, is to bay for all land required for military purposes seven if it be contended that

Lette

an 14289

98.

wherea Chidiya

newtor work

this new-arrangement only came into operation on the bet. Jan last & that this land

(x)-81215-4000-6-1900

36518-3000-11-1900

as obligation

001

the Colony to

hand wer land to the War Dept in

anticipation of any Mel Land being morendered to the Colony,

How

fact the practically

not

Me: Lands Account has with th

come into existence in Sthing unce the

value of thul Lands hitter to merendered t

the Colony only amounts to $42,

Saft

20

Sx X

& take offortunity of again asking W.I to pay to H. Kong $ 10, 465.04 referred to

in letter

Ow

31905

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.